Jump to content

Mark Salling (of Glee) Gets Arrested!


Cypher

Recommended Posts

Quote

Mark Salling has been arrested for possession of child pornography, reports “Crime Watch Daily." He is currently being transported to jail where he will be booked.

Sources tell the show that the Los Angeles Police Department Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force unit served a search warrant early this morning at an address in Sunland, California, where he resides.

Salling is best known for his role as Noah "Puck" Puckerman on the hit television series “Glee.”

“Crime Watch Daily” has reached out to Salling’s reps for comment, but have not heard back.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, trayertrash said:

I  can't with y'all thinking someone viewing child exploitation is hot...  

I think it's hot for some people just like the idea of group rape, ugh... 

I don't like Glee, by the way. I know that it's not important, but I just wanted to say this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hawks said:

I think it's hot for some people just like the idea of group rape, ugh... 

I don't like Glee, by the way. I know that it's not important, but I just wanted to say this.

 

The difference is that consenting adults can act out a gang rape fantasy, view porn based around their fantasy that's legal and consensual without actually wanting or needing to rape someone. It's the same idea of bdsm - you can want to do certain things to your partner and enjoy it because it's fun and consensual for the both of you, but you don't necessarily want to go around tying people up and raping them...

Child exploitation though? No. There's no way around it. A child will always have to have been sexually abused and exploited for that porn to be there. A child will have to undergo sexual abuse. There is no consent. There's no way to get pornographic images of children without abuse. To me, y'all are saying it's okay for someone to take my daughter, take nude pictures of her, molest and rape her in order for someone to have shit to jerk off to. 

  • YAAASSS 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update!

Quote

11:45 AM PT --  Law enforcement sources now tell us they've already seen more than a thousand images of "child sexual exploitation" on Salling's computer. Cops also seized other electronic devices, including tablets and cellphones. We're also told he lives alone, which will make it hard to argue someone else put the images in the computer.

Our sources say when cops arrived to search the home, Salling was "shocked."

We're also told Salling has already lawyered up.

Law enforcement sources say the images they captured from Salling's computer were children ... significantly younger than 15 and 16 year olds.
Our sources say an ex-girlfriend of Salling's tipped off cops and they investigated before the raid to make sure it wasn't a revenge allegation.

Quote

Mark Salling has bailed out of jail with the help of his family ... this after his arrest for allegedly possessing more than a thousand child porn images.

We got a shot of Mark leaving the jail -- leaning back out of view in the passenger's seat -- after being booked on possession of child porn ... specifically porn involving minors "engaging in or simulating sexual conduct."

We've learned the bail was set at $20,000 and his family posted it ... they put down $2k, or 10%.

The law provides if there are more than 600 images, the maximum punishment is 5 years in prison.

 

Edited by Cypher
  • YAAASSS 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trayertrash said:

The difference is that consenting adults can act out a gang rape fantasy, view porn based around their fantasy that's legal and consensual without actually wanting or needing to rape someone. It's the same idea of bdsm - you can want to do certain things to your partner and enjoy it because it's fun and consensual for the both of you, but you don't necessarily want to go around tying people up and raping them...

Child exploitation though? No. There's no way around it. A child will always have to have been sexually abused and exploited for that porn to be there. A child will have to undergo sexual abuse. There is no consent. There's no way to get pornographic images of children without abuse. To me, y'all are saying it's okay for someone to take my daughter, take nude pictures of her, molest and rape her in order for someone to have shit to jerk off to. 

Of course I don't try to justify it. I'm against it. It's not proper in any way to sexually abuse any children. Sorry if I sounded opposite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...