Main Pop Girl Posted June 27, 2015 Posted June 27, 2015 It’s a showdown between the two biggest pop stars in the world. The NFL wants either Taylor Swift or Britney Spears to star in the 2016 Super Bowl Halftime Show, but who will be chosen is totally up to them. Find out all the EXCLUSIVE details here! Oops! Britney Spears might do it again. 15 years after starring in the 2001 Super Bowl Halftime Show — alongside NSYNC, Mary J. Blige, Nelly and Aerosmith — HollywoodLife.com has EXCLUSIVELY learned that the NFL wants her to star in their 2016 Halftime Show, during it’s 50th championship game. But they also want Taylor Swift. So who are they ultimately going to choose? Well, that seems to be up to Britney and T-Swizzle. Idk how to feel about this...Britney has a much larger variety of songs to choose from and would definitely put on a good show if she could pull it off, like she did at the Billboard Music Awards. But Taylor would probably put on a better performance overall and she's definitely more current, even if I think her songs are boring as fuck. Quote
Baby V Alex Posted June 27, 2015 Posted June 27, 2015 I think that if Taylor uses her old song would be like Bruno Mars all over again and if Britney doesn't wanna do it and they make her do it it will be a mess, so I'm in nobodies side for this just 1 Quote
Beauty King Posted June 27, 2015 Posted June 27, 2015 Taylor has an endorsement deal with Coca Cola, which is apparently a big no-no for halftime show candidates, since the show is sponsored by Pepsi. That's supposed to be the main reason that she's not likely to do it. I don't really see Britney doing it either, for obvious reasons. Once Gaga has another era under her belt, it's definitely her turn, though. Quote
Main Pop Girl Posted June 27, 2015 Author Posted June 27, 2015 Taylor has an endorsement deal with Coca Cola, which is apparently a big no-no for halftime show candidates, since the show is sponsored by Pepsi. That's supposed to be the main reason that she's not likely to do it. I don't really see Britney doing it either, for obvious reasons. Once Gaga has another era under her belt, it's definitely her turn, though. Gaga was apparently already offered it the year Madonna ended up performing, and supposedly turned it down because she wasn't a fan of the lip-syncing cause. The only way I could see her accepting is if they let her sing live tbh. Quote
Baby V Alex Posted June 27, 2015 Posted June 27, 2015 Gaga was apparently already offered it the year Madonna ended up performing, and supposedly turned it down because she wasn't a fan of the lip-syncing cause. The only way I could see her accepting is if they let her sing live tbh. Then she is fucked up and it won't work, they lip-sync for the simple reason of acoustics, the stadium is huuuuge and the stream needs to be flawless, so they lip-sync to make sure that everybody can listen to the show, and not just the middle section. Quote
Cypher Posted June 29, 2015 Posted June 29, 2015 I'm okay with either of them, but I think Taylor would put on a better spectacle. Just as long as they don't eff up their performance cause I'm still thinking about Beyonce's performance and it's been two years. Quote
Kesha Posted June 29, 2015 Posted June 29, 2015 I hope it's Taylor but Britney would be good too. Quote
Main Pop Girl Posted June 29, 2015 Author Posted June 29, 2015 Then she is fucked up and it won't work, they lip-sync for the simple reason of acoustics, the stadium is huuuuge and the stream needs to be flawless, so they lip-sync to make sure that everybody can listen to the show, and not just the middle section. That doesn't even make sense. If they can blast a pre-recorded song to an entire stadium, they can definitely do the same thing with live vocals. They just want every note to be hit perfectly which imo is kind of boring and a total giveaway that it's lip synced. Quote
Elizabeth Posted September 29, 2016 Posted September 29, 2016 On 6/29/2015 at 9:24 PM, Countess said: That doesn't even make sense. If they can blast a pre-recorded song to an entire stadium, they can definitely do the same thing with live vocals. They just want every note to be hit perfectly which imo is kind of boring and a total giveaway that it's lip synced. Nope it is due to nipplegate. You could shout out Free Palestine or USA sucks and get the NFL in trouble leading to mega fines. Quote
milanimiani Posted September 29, 2016 Posted September 29, 2016 Well Britney's definitely got the lip-sync part down already....that's all she does now Quote
Main Pop Girl Posted October 1, 2016 Author Posted October 1, 2016 On 9/30/2016 at 2:48 AM, Elizabeth said: Nope it is due to nipplegate. You could shout out Free Palestine or USA sucks and get the NFL in trouble leading to mega fines. Hmm, maybe. But the weird thing is that the biggest controversies at the Super Bowl lately (Janet's boob and M.I.A.'s middle finger) were both physical actions and not affected by the microphone or lip syncing at all. On 9/30/2016 at 3:27 AM, milanimiani said: Well Britney's definitely got the lip-sync part down already....that's all she does now To be honest, she's pretty much always lip synced so nothing's changed too much... 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.