Carcunt

I'm just afraid it'll try to be Bates Motel/Psycho or something...

I'm actually really liking this idea.

True... lmao

He's referring to Isabella Summers (aka The Machine), not the text "The Machine". Isabella doesn't perform live with Flo and she really only co-writes and produces, which is why her image is never featured on the album covers, despite inspiring the group's name. I figured it was a generally known thing that Isabella Summers is The Machine

Wait For Life On The Toilet

Well, from the stills we've seen, it looks like it's going to be really enjoyable. I'll reserve judgement. From what we've seen, it seems to be typical F+TM. Flo doing something ceremonial (no pun intended) with a song of heavy drums and ritualistic vocals. Ugh, not really here for that tbh. :'( The two songs we've heard so far had me excited that she was trying some new sounds and moving away from the typical chanting and emotive vocals she's been using for her past two albums...I hope she doesn't disappoint. Lungs and Ceremonials were very different, though. Lungs was more fun, while Ceremonials was a bit more serious, I think. They have a similar sound, but I don't think it's a bad sound. It's just not something I'm a fan of tbh, which is a shame because I love her voice and I like her a lot as a person. That's why I was looking forward to a new production style from her. Well then you're in luck because she has a solo album that's supposed to be in the works right now, as well as this album with The Machine She's gotta cater to ALL the people lmao because I'm sure she's aware that some people don't care for that style For real? I would love that tbh! She better work with Calvin again for the solo album, but maybe even on some like slower songs, not the typical EDM we expect from him. Is this album she's releasing now even featuring The Machine tho? They're not listed on the cover so I was kinda confused... How Big, How Blue, How Beautiful is Florence + The Machine (The Machine never is featured on the cover of their albums, Idk why but she just isn't ;- but Florence Welch has a completely solo album she's working on but not a whole lot is really known about it, as far as I know. I haven't heard much about it, but I've heard from other fans of hers that she's working on it, as well as HB3. And it's supposed to be a different sound, so that's what I'm waiting to hear, really...

Well, from the stills we've seen, it looks like it's going to be really enjoyable. I'll reserve judgement. From what we've seen, it seems to be typical F+TM. Flo doing something ceremonial (no pun intended) with a song of heavy drums and ritualistic vocals. Ugh, not really here for that tbh. :'( The two songs we've heard so far had me excited that she was trying some new sounds and moving away from the typical chanting and emotive vocals she's been using for her past two albums...I hope she doesn't disappoint. Lungs and Ceremonials were very different, though. Lungs was more fun, while Ceremonials was a bit more serious, I think. They have a similar sound, but I don't think it's a bad sound. It's just not something I'm a fan of tbh, which is a shame because I love her voice and I like her a lot as a person. That's why I was looking forward to a new production style from her. Well then you're in luck because she has a solo album that's supposed to be in the works right now, as well as this album with The Machine She's gotta cater to ALL the people lmao because I'm sure she's aware that some people don't care for that style

Well, from the stills we've seen, it looks like it's going to be really enjoyable. I'll reserve judgement. From what we've seen, it seems to be typical F+TM. Flo doing something ceremonial (no pun intended) with a song of heavy drums and ritualistic vocals. Ugh, not really here for that tbh. The two songs we've heard so far had me excited that she was trying some new sounds and moving away from the typical chanting and emotive vocals she's been using for her past two albums...I hope she doesn't disappoint. Lungs and Ceremonials were very different, though. Lungs was more fun, while Ceremonials was a bit more serious, I think. They have a similar sound, but I don't think it's a bad sound.

That's really not uncommon. Almost all professional photoshoots have ridiculous numbers of outtakes because photographers take pictures once or twice a second. Almost all of Lana's professional photoshoots with multiple outfits have 1000+ photos that will never make their way into the public sphere. I'm just really shocked that all 1400 leaked. It's just a lot, really.

1400 PICS?!?! WTF OMG

Happy birthday!!!

Does that first photo look like that Britney picture from a while back? No? What about that Avril picture from last year? (Although the second one was completely edited.) The original:

Hell yes! Im so used to you talking shit. Lol. No. This is what $chwagg is ladies and gentlemen. Well don't get it twisted, I still hate this piece of trash. I just like that judging by his new haircut, Chris and his hairstylist both hate him just as much as I do. Omg dead.

Well, from the stills we've seen, it looks like it's going to be really enjoyable. I'll reserve judgement. From what we've seen, it seems to be typical F+TM. Flo doing something ceremonial (no pun intended) with a song of heavy drums and ritualistic vocals.

She's still on the website...

The venue changes keep happening at the beginning of every season from four onwards. It does lose some of its original charm over time, but Nancy, Silas, Shane, Andy and Doug get really huge developments, since they're the only ones who stick around for the whole run. Season Five's one of my favorites, though, so you really should keep going. Yeah, I've been trying to but then I forget about it. It's like Dexter, I'm in season 7 and still need to finish it but haven't because I forgot about it. The great thing about Weeds is that it's super easy to marathon, as all the episodes are only 20-ish minutes long. You can do a whole season in a day with minimal effort. Which is both, a good and a bad thing, really. It's good for bingeing but it's bad if you're really into the show. Then again, I went through 9 seasons of The Office in a month...

The venue changes keep happening at the beginning of every season from four onwards. It does lose some of its original charm over time, but Nancy, Silas, Shane, Andy and Doug get really huge developments, since they're the only ones who stick around for the whole run. Season Five's one of my favorites, though, so you really should keep going. Yeah, I've been trying to but then I forget about it. It's like Dexter, I'm in season 7 and still need to finish it but haven't because I forgot about it.

Did someone glue burned Cheetos to his head or something?

I've loved this show for so long tbh. I'm still in season four, but I love it so much. It's so weird to watch it, now, after the switch up in the setting...

[iurl=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/hilary-duff-files-divorce-husband-report-article-1.2123549]Source[/iurl]

So does this mean all those people who are committing suicide every year should just get their shit together and stop crying, cutting, and taking pills? Like grow up already cause some people have real world problems. Not at all. As someone who's been on the brink multiple times, I can say pretty honestly that I don't think Iggy's problems are as bad as those of many other people who've had their dirty laundry aired. Sure, the Papa John's incident was an annoyance, but to get so worked up over it and then to put all those tweets out in public, when I'm sure she could've dealt with a manager at the shop privately? That speaks to her status as an attention-seeking person. Her rant to that paparazzo in the parking lot of that grocery store also speaks to this. She knew full well that she was being filmed and chose to go on a rant against the evils of paparazzi, despite the fact that it was entirely her choice to decide whether or not to try to be famous. She could pull a full Sia, for all I care. At least Sia did it for the right reasons, since she's an intelligent enough person to be creative in her solutions to the problems of celebrity life. But the point that she was making in the parking lot and on Twitter about Papa John's wasn't about the situation itself, she was talking about the fact that she should have 10 minutes to go to a grocery store and get groceries or be able to order pizza without feeling like someone was stalking her. That's an invasion of privacy, celebrity or not. Privacy is not a right guaranteed to any citizen of the United States under any circumstances. By becoming a celebrity, you give up an implied right. The second you decide to hit it big, your days of keeping things under wraps are 100% done. Iggy's naïve if she didn't realize that beforehand. Oh, but there are some laws that are supposed to be used to enforce privacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Shine_the_Light_law - Regarding the whole pizza thing Looks like she should take that up with Papa Johns. That's what she did, but she probably also thought it would be a good idea to put it out there publicly so celebrities know not to order there unless that want, once again, a privacy breach.

Well, from the stills we've seen, it looks like it's going to be really enjoyable.

So does this mean all those people who are committing suicide every year should just get their shit together and stop crying, cutting, and taking pills? Like grow up already cause some people have real world problems. Not at all. As someone who's been on the brink multiple times, I can say pretty honestly that I don't think Iggy's problems are as bad as those of many other people who've had their dirty laundry aired. Sure, the Papa John's incident was an annoyance, but to get so worked up over it and then to put all those tweets out in public, when I'm sure she could've dealt with a manager at the shop privately? That speaks to her status as an attention-seeking person. Her rant to that paparazzo in the parking lot of that grocery store also speaks to this. She knew full well that she was being filmed and chose to go on a rant against the evils of paparazzi, despite the fact that it was entirely her choice to decide whether or not to try to be famous. She could pull a full Sia, for all I care. At least Sia did it for the right reasons, since she's an intelligent enough person to be creative in her solutions to the problems of celebrity life. But the point that she was making in the parking lot and on Twitter about Papa John's wasn't about the situation itself, she was talking about the fact that she should have 10 minutes to go to a grocery store and get groceries or be able to order pizza without feeling like someone was stalking her. That's an invasion of privacy, celebrity or not. Privacy is not a right guaranteed to any citizen of the United States under any circumstances. By becoming a celebrity, you give up an implied right. The second you decide to hit it big, your days of keeping things under wraps are 100% done. Iggy's naïve if she didn't realize that beforehand. Oh, but there are some laws that are supposed to be used to enforce privacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Shine_the_Light_law - Regarding the whole pizza thing

So does this mean all those people who are committing suicide every year should just get their shit together and stop crying, cutting, and taking pills? Like grow up already cause some people have real world problems. Not at all. As someone who's been on the brink multiple times, I can say pretty honestly that I don't think Iggy's problems are as bad as those of many other people who've had their dirty laundry aired. Sure, the Papa John's incident was an annoyance, but to get so worked up over it and then to put all those tweets out in public, when I'm sure she could've dealt with a manager at the shop privately? That speaks to her status as an attention-seeking person. Her rant to that paparazzo in the parking lot of that grocery store also speaks to this. She knew full well that she was being filmed and chose to go on a rant against the evils of paparazzi, despite the fact that it was entirely her choice to decide whether or not to try to be famous. She could pull a full Sia, for all I care. At least Sia did it for the right reasons, since she's an intelligent enough person to be creative in her solutions to the problems of celebrity life. But the point that she was making in the parking lot and on Twitter about Papa John's wasn't about the situation itself, she was talking about the fact that she should have 10 minutes to go to a grocery store and get groceries or be able to order pizza without feeling like someone was stalking her. That's an invasion of privacy, celebrity or not.

Honestly, Iggy saying the word "dyke" isn't wrong to me in the slightest. It's clear from the context of her Tweet (and the fact that she was even hanging out with lesbians in the first place?) that she doesn't consider the term offensive and that she didn't intend it as an insult. Idk if y'all have this overseas, but in Australia we even have a "gang" of lesbians called "dykes on bikes" who come out to every year's Mardi Gras on motorbikes and totally play to the butch stereotype. I'm not sure if that's who she was referring to when she said she hung around lesbians at a young age but it's not like it's an unheard of concept. I've never heard of that in the US. I'm pretty sure it's just an exclusive thing to your Mardi Gras stuff. (Speaking of which, it's nice to know that something from near my city (about an hour away, Mobile, AL) is a big deal across the world. It was the first in the US, but I'm not sure about before in the 1600s... I also recently learned that we used to have a Mardi Gras ball in my city where there was a Mardi Gras king and queen, interesting enough.)